From 4545fab5bbe62e5a1dae3e999cc15b286792cb2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Triesch <setri100@hhu.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 07:39:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Updated README

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 2890b33..c37940c 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ EDTA will produce multiple outputs:
 make sure to delete headers starting with ### in the respecrtive files, they can't be read by numpy!
 
 ### Fig. 2: EDTA results analysis:
-The [code for the results presented in Fig.2](https://git.nfdi4plants.org/hhu-plant-biochemistry/triesch2023_brassicaceae_transposons/-/blob/main/workflows/Fig2_genome_size.ipynb) contains a basic analysis of the `EDTA` results. The genome size were hard-coded from the amount of bases in the respective genome .fasta files. It was distinguished between the "FRAGMENTED" and "INTACT" outputs of `EDTA`.
+The [code for the results presented in Fig.2](/blob/main/workflows/Fig2_genome_size.ipynb) contains a basic analysis of the `EDTA` results. The genome size were hard-coded from the amount of bases in the respective genome .fasta files. It was distinguished between the "FRAGMENTED" and "INTACT" outputs of `EDTA`.
 
 ### Fig.3: TE classes
 The [code for Fig.3](https://git.nfdi4plants.org/hhu-plant-biochemistry/triesch2023_brassicaceae_transposons/-/blob/main/workflows/Fig3_TE_types.ipynb) contains a breakdown of the TE classes as analyzed in `EDTA`. The lengths of the TEs (as numbers of base pairs) were counted and compared.
-- 
GitLab